The pooled TBL effect on examination scores is robust to leave-one-out sensitivity analysis and model choice, and publication bias was not detected¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Deleting any single study left the significant TBL effect unchanged (SMD range 2.26–2.67), and a fixed-effects model yielded a consistent significant effect (SMD = 1.63). → Chen Minjian 2018
q3 i? Begg's test did not reveal funnel plot asymmetry (P = 0.059), making publication bias unlikely. → Chen Minjian 2018
Evidence¶
Chen Minjian 2018¶
Chen Minjian, Ni Chunhui, Hu Yanhui, Wang Meilin, Liu Lu, Ji Xiaoming, Chu Haiyan, Wu Wei, Lu Chuncheng, Wang Shouyu, Wang Shoulin, Zhao Liping, Li Zhong, Zhu Huijuan, Wang Jianming, Xia Yankai, Wang Xinru. (2018). Meta-analysis on the effectiveness of team-based learning on medical education in China. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1179-1
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Sensitivity analysis in which each of the 13 studies was deleted in turn; the significant TBL effect was unchanged (SMD 2.26–2.67). A fixed-effects model also gave a significant effect (SMD = 1.63, 95% CI: 1.51–1.76), and Begg's test gave P = 0.059.
"When any research was removed from the model, the significant results of TBL effect on the students’ examination scores were unchanged in these models (SMD: 2.26–2.67, 95% CI: 1.32–3.67, n = 13)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pooled satisfaction and self-confidence effects are sensitive to individual studies, while knowledge, performance and self-efficacy effects are robust in leave-one-out analysis — related
- The CBL exam-score advantage is robust to subgroup and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses but shows potential publication bias — related
- No single study affected the statistically significant PBL advantage in sensitivity analysis — related
- Pooled gamification effects remain stable when high-risk-of-bias studies are excluded and in leave-one-out and fixed-effect sensitivity analyses — related
- Among female-only medical college (3-year program) students, TBL significantly increased examination scores with minimal heterogeneity (SMD = 0.47) — related
- The pooled VR score effect is robust to study removal and shows no significant publication bias — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.