Claims

TBL improves ethical reasoning and moral sensitivity

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? TBL improved students' ability to identify ethical violations and apply ethical principles in case scenarios. → Alizadeh Maryam 2025

Evidence

Alizadeh Maryam 2025

Alizadeh Maryam, Bahrami Shirin, Saeedi Zeinabe, Khaninezhad Loghman. (2025). Outcomes of team based learning in teaching medical ethics: a systematic review. BMC Medical Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-025-01329-8

q3 · i? · review · r2

In Alp (2025), "students successfully identified ethical violations in case scenarios, such as withholding a cancer diagnosis (violating autonomy), age-based discrimination in hospital admissions (breaching equality)", demonstrating gains in moral sensitivity. No standardized effect size was printed for this finding.

"Alp (2025) reported that students successfully identified ethical violations in case scenarios, such as withholding a cancer diagnosis (violating autonomy), age-based discrimination in hospital admissions (breaching equality)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.