Teacher-centred students reported cognitive difficulties including inefficient, transient, superficial and rote learning¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the teacher-centred group's cognition sub-theme, inefficient learning (6/10), transient learning (4/10), superficial learning (2/10) and rote learning (2/10) codes indicated weak cognitive structure formation. → Koseoglu 2015

Evidence¶

Koseoglu 2015¶

Koseoglu, P., & Efendioglu, A. (2015). Can a Multimedia Tool Help Students' Learning Performance in Complex Biology Subjects? South African Journal of Education, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1169

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Cognition sub-theme of the teacher-centred interview analysis: "'inefficient learning' (n = 6/10), 'transient learning' (n = 4/10)" plus superficial and rote learning codes. The authors interpret these as failure to build core meaning.

"'inefficient learning' (n = 6/10), 'transient learning' (n = 4/10), 'superficial learning ' (n = 2/10), and 'rote learning ' (n = 2/10) codes show that the students cannot constitute cognitive structure in terms of creation of core meaning of the subjects"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students who perceive assessment demands as assessing deep, higher-level cognitive processing employ deep approaches, while those perceiving rote-recall demands employ surface approaches — related
• Task completion with GenAI is a weak proxy for durable competence, with struggling learners at risk of an illusion of competence — related
• Students in the teacher-centred group reported boredom, a need for repetition, and ineffective time management — related