Claims

Students in the teacher-centred group reported boredom, a need for repetition, and ineffective time management

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among ten interviewed teacher-centred-group students, the most prominent codes were need for repetition of subjects (8/10) and boredom (8/10); ineffective time management was cited by 3/10. → Koseoglu 2015

Evidence

Koseoglu 2015

Koseoglu, P., & Efendioglu, A. (2015). Can a Multimedia Tool Help Students' Learning Performance in Complex Biology Subjects? South African Journal of Education, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v35n4a1169

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Content analysis of interviews with 10 teacher-centred-group students found "the need for 'repetition of subjects ' (n = 8/10) and 'boredom' (n = 8/10)" as the most prominent codes; ineffective time management was cited by three students.

"the most prominent codes are the need for 'repetition of subjects ' (n = 8/10) and 'boredom' (n = 8/10), where students state their views as follows"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.