Teacher buy-in and willingness to engage are viewed as strong mediators of coaching benefits¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 4 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Teachers and coaches reported that teacher buy-in would strongly mediate the overall effect of coaching, and that resistant teachers show lower-quality outcomes. → White 2015
Evidence¶
White 2015¶
White, A. S., Howell Smith, M., Kunz, G. M., & Nugent, G. C. (2015). Active ingredients of instructional coaching: Developing a conceptual framework (R2Ed Working Paper No. 2015-3). https://r2ed.unl.edu/resources_workingpapers.shtml
q2 · i? · qualitative · r2
Requisite Teacher Characteristics section of the focus group study: teachers saw buy-in as affecting attitudes and the coaching relationship; coaches described the most successful teachers as those who "weren’t afraid to fail." The article also cites prior work connecting teacher resistance to lower-quality outcomes.
"Teachers felt that teacher “buy in” would be a strong mediator of the overall effect of the coaching, since it affects every part of the study, from teacher attitudes to the coaching relationship."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Pairing coaching with group trainings is associated with larger effects on instruction and achievement; instructional materials with larger, and video libraries with smaller, effects on instruction — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Framework identifies teacher prerequisites: basic content knowledge, willingness to engage, and genuine concern for improving student learning — related
- Personalized Learning Effects Vary With Fidelity — a broader claim this one bears on
- Students' application of teacher support predicts accurate answers in small-group work — related
- Teachers would engage in analytics-informed inquiry if they saw direct benefits for student outcomes and the process were a regular part of their work — related
- Participating K-3 teachers vary widely in existing literacy practices, resources, understandings, and willingness to use DLS — related
- Video-based analysis of teacher-student interactions mediates positive coaching outcomes, and challenging teachers supports reflection but is uncommon — related
- Mediator-outcome association analyses can identify teacher practice mediators most associated with student learning — related
- Deeper co-leadership emerges when staff support lets partners progressively take on responsibility, but recedes when staff carry the process — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-buy-in-mediates-coaching-benefit |
title |
Teacher buy-in and willingness to engage are viewed as strong mediators of coaching benefits |
description |
Teacher buy-in and willingness to engage are viewed as strong mediators of coaching benefits |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — white-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.