Claims

Teacher experience and STEM major predict content knowledge but not implementation of the intervention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Teacher experience and STEM major had significant positive associations with teacher content knowledge (β = .74 and β = .71, both p = .000). → Desimone and Hill 2017 q3 i? Neither experience nor STEM major had a significant association with implementation of the intervention. → Desimone and Hill 2017 (2)

Evidence

Desimone and Hill 2017

Laura M. Desimone, Kirsten Lee Hill. (2017). Inside the Black Box: Examining Mediators and Moderators of a Middle School Science Intervention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717697842

q3 · i3 · associational · r2

SEM results for Research Question 2 in the model of 124 teachers: the printed standardized coefficients β =.74 and β =.71 (both p = .000) exceed the large-effect threshold.

"Teacher experience and STEM major had sig- nificant positive associations with teacher content knowledge (β =.74, p = .000; β =.71, p = .000, respectively)"

Desimone and Hill 2017 (2)

Laura M. Desimone, Kirsten Lee Hill. (2017). Inside the Black Box: Examining Mediators and Moderators of a Middle School Science Intervention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717697842

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Same SEM: Table 3 shows implementation coefficients for novice (0.178) and STEM major (0.029) were nonsignificant; no effect size is printed for these null paths.

"but neither had a significant asso- ciation with implementation of the intervention"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.