Teacher judgment ratings diverged from standardized test results for individual pupils¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 1918 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The seven pupils making the highest grammar test scores, ranking above the standard score, were all marked deficient in English by their teachers. → Buford Johnson 1918
Evidence¶
Buford Johnson 1918¶
Buford Johnson. (1918). The Use of Tests in the Evaluation of Methods of Instruction. The Journal of Educational Psychology. https://www.google.com/search?q=The+Use+of+Tests+in+the+Evaluation+of+Methods+of+Instruction+Johnson+1918
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Comparison of individual test records with teacher deficiency markings. The article reports "The seven making highest scores in grammar tests, ranking above the standard score, are all marked deficient in English" and interprets this as teachers not knowing real difficulties.
"The seven making highest scores in grammar tests, ranking above the standard score, are all marked deficient in English. This may mean a failure in spelling or composition, in which they are not tested; but it also means that the teacher for the summer instruction did not know the real difficulties so that the situation could be adjusted for the individual's specific needs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Standardized test results showed the greatest deficiency in grammar tests among summer-school pupils — related
- Spelling test scores correlate highly with teachers' year-long marks (average coefficient .69 across grades 3–8) — related
- Comparison with standard scores suggested three groupings of pupils with distinct instructional needs — related
- Whipple's Group Test for Grammar Grades is only tentatively standardized and its administration difficulties make its use somewhat unsatisfactory — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-judgment-diverges-from-tests |
title |
Teacher judgment ratings diverged from standardized test results for individual pupils |
description |
Teacher judgment ratings diverged from standardized test results for individual pupils |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
1918 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — buford-johnson-1918 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.