Teachers' self-determination does not predict students' self-determination or corresponding motivational regulations¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Teachers' self-determination did not predict individual students' self-determination (ß = .08, p > .05), and no teacher regulation predicted the corresponding student regulation. → Taylor 2007

Evidence¶

Taylor 2007¶

Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Multilevel regression with teacher SDI as a level-2 predictor of student SDI (51 teachers, 787 students). The article reports a non-significant effect (ß = .08) and non-significant regulation-level effects, e.g. "intrinsic motivation (ß = .09, p > .05)"; equivalence was not tested.

"teachers' self-determination did not predict individual students' self-determination (ß = .08, p > .05). Furthermore, non-significant relationships were also found between teacher and student self-reports of intrinsic motivation (ß = .09, p > .05)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teacher and student perceptions of strategy use converge only for involvement; teacher perceptions of student self-determination predict student-reported self-determination — related
• Teacher-reported strategies show a different pattern: involvement positively predicts student self-determination via relatedness, autonomy support negatively predicts it, and structure does not predict it — related