Teacher-reported strategies show a different pattern: involvement positively predicts student self-determination via relatedness, autonomy support negatively predicts it, and structure does not predict it¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Teacher reports of involvement positively predicted student SDI (ß = .23), autonomy support negatively predicted it (ß = -.13), and structure did not predict it (ß = .02). → Taylor 2007
q3 i? Only relatedness mediated the teacher-reported involvement–student SDI relationship; no mediation was found for teacher-reported autonomy support. → Taylor 2007 (2)
Evidence¶
Taylor 2007¶
Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Multilevel regression using teacher reports of the three strategies (51 teachers, 787 students) predicting student SDI. The article reports involvement positive (ß = .23), autonomy support negative (ß = -.13), and structure non-significant (ß = .02).
"Teacher reports of involvement positively predicted student SDI (ß = .23, p < .001), autonomy support negatively predicted student SDI (ß = -.13, p < .05), however, structure did not predict student SDI (ß = .02, p > .05)."
Taylor 2007 (2)¶
Taylor, I. M., & Ntoumanis, N. (2007). Teacher motivational strategies and student self-determination in physical education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 747-760. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.747
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Multiple-mediator multilevel analysis of teacher-reported strategies (Table 4.4). Teacher-reported involvement predicted relatedness (ß = .23) and relatedness predicted student SDI (ß = .20), so "relatedness mediated the involvement-student SDI relationship"; teacher-reported autonomy support predicted no need satisfaction.
"with student perceptions of relatedness as the mediator, all mediation steps were significant indicating that relatedness mediated the involvement-student SDI relationship."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student perceptions of autonomy support, structure, and involvement positively predict student self-determination, mediated by autonomy and competence need satisfaction — related
- Teacher and student perceptions of strategy use converge only for involvement; teacher perceptions of student self-determination predict student-reported self-determination — related
- Teachers' self-determination does not predict students' self-determination or corresponding motivational regulations — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-reported-strategies-student-sdi |
title |
Teacher-reported strategies show a different pattern: involvement positively predicts student self-determination via relatedness, autonomy support negatively predicts it, and structure does not predict it |
description |
Teacher-reported strategies show a different pattern: involvement positively predicts student self-determination via relatedness, autonomy support negatively predicts it, and structure does not predict it |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — taylor-2007, taylor-2007-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.