Claims

Teacher training in natural communication strategies and social stories improved social skills of students with autism versus control

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-03 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After the program, the experimental group scored significantly higher than the control group on the Social Skills Scale total and both sub-dimensions (Mann-Whitney, p = .01). → Alothman 2016

Evidence

Alothman 2016

Alothman, I. A. (2016). The Efficiency of a Selective Training Program on the Development of Some Social Skills of Saudi Students with Autism. International Education Studies, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n5p265

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of 3 experimental and 3 control male students with autism aged 9-12 at an institute in Riyadh; Mann-Whitney tests on the researcher's Social Skills Scale showed post-program differences "in favor of the experimental group" at .01 for social engagement, social communication, and total degree.

"Table 5 shows statistically-significant differences at (.01) between the averages of scores ranks between the experimental and control groups on the SSS and its sub-dimensions after the application of the program in favor of the experimental group"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.