Teachers' subjective task values for TSRs—intrinsic, attainment, utility, and cost—shape their motivation to build relationships¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Perceived costs, especially time pressure and opportunity costs, can undermine teachers' motivation to engage in relationship-building behaviors. → Robinson 2022
Evidence¶
Robinson 2022¶
Robinson, C. D. (2022). A Framework for Motivating Teacher-Student Relationships. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-022-09706-0
q1 · i? · theoretical · r2
Theoretical argument applying situated expectancy-value theory's four subcomponents (intrinsic, attainment, utility value, and costs) to TSR-building. The article notes time pressure is "a pervasive stressor for teachers" and that evaluation based only on test scores may raise perceived opportunity costs. No empirical test is reported in this article.
"there also may be opportunity costs associated with engaging in relationship-building behaviors if they replace other, presumably more productive instructional behaviors"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers' relational self-efficacy—beliefs in their capability to form, maintain, and repair relationships—is hypothesized to motivate TSR-building, but existing global self-efficacy measures show mixed links to TSR quality — related
- Sociocultural contexts—school, professional community, policy, and society—shape teachers' motivational beliefs about TSRs — related
- Teachers are unlikely to build positive TSRs unless they believe relationship-building is their role — related
- Teachers who find using AI enjoyable, engaging and satisfying (intrinsic/interest value) may be more motivated to use it (theoretical argument). — related
- Teachers who believe AI use will contribute to their professional success and identity (attainment value) may be more motivated to use it (theoretical argument). — related
- Teachers who perceive the challenges and barriers of using AI as high (cost) may be less motivated to use it (theoretical argument). — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-values-shape-tsr-motivation |
title |
Teachers' subjective task values for TSRs—intrinsic, attainment, utility, and cost—shape their motivation to build relationships |
description |
Teachers' subjective task values for TSRs—intrinsic, attainment, utility, and cost—shape their motivation to build relationships |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — robinson-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.