For teachers, higher privacy levels lowered confidence regarding an AI supporting student emotional health, indirectly reducing intention to use (Emotion-AI)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the teacher Emotion-AI model, privacy had a significant negative impact on confidence (β = -0.6581, p = 0.0012), confidence significantly impacted ITU (β = 0.4744, p = 0.0447), and the indirect effect of privacy on ITU through confidence was statistically significant (Effect = -0.3122, BootLLCI = -0.6559, BootULCI = -0.0511). → Alexander John Karran 2025
Evidence¶
Alexander John Karran 2025¶
Alexander John Karran, Patrick Charland, Joé Trempe-Martineau, Ana Ortiz de Guinea Lopez de Arana, Anne-Marie Lesage, Sylvain Sénécal & Pierre-Majorique Léger. (2025). Multi-stakeholder perspective on responsible artificial intelligence and acceptability in education. npj Science of Learning 10:44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00333-2
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Mediation analysis of teacher responses to the Emotion-AI vignette. The direct effect of privacy on ITU was not statistically significant (β = 0.1118, p = 0.6144); the indirect effect through confidence was statistically significant, indicating privacy indirectly affects acceptance through its impact on confidence.
"privacy had a significant negative impact on con fidence (β = -0.6581, p =0.0012), indi-cating that higher levels of privacy were associated with lower confidence levels in the context of an AI that supports emotional health"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- For students, privacy (Answer-AI) and explainability (Emotion-AI) each positively influenced intention to use indirectly through perceived global utility — related
- For parents, higher AI agency lowered confidence, which indirectly reduced intention to allow AI to correct student work (Correct-AI) — related
- Student-facing AI raises serious wellbeing, equity, and safety concerns, and some educators express more confidence in teacher-facing tools — related
- Higher AI agency is associated with lower intention to use AI in education, while transparency, explainability, and privacy do not directly predict intention to use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.