Claims

Teachers in the study favor exposing learners to authentic listening materials earlier than expert consensus recommends

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 60% of teachers believed learners should be exposed to authentic materials early, and about 70% said intermediate-level students should receive them. → Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Evidence

Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Amir Mahdavi Zhafarghandi, Behzad Barekat, & Sepideh Homaei. (2014). A Survey of Iranian EFL Teachers' and Learners' Perceptions Toward Authentic Listening Materials at University Level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.4p.184

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Table 5 survey of teachers' views on initial exposure timing; the article notes this contrasts with expert positions that authentic materials suit only intermediate and advanced levels. Descriptive percentages only.

"Unlike many experts in the realm of TEFL, 60% of teachers in this study believed that learners should be exposed to these materials early (Item, 29). About 70% of teacher (Item, 30) said that the intermediate level students should receive authentic materials."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.