Claims

Most teachers prefer listening classes combining both authentic and simplified materials rather than either type alone

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? About 80% of teachers believed a listening class using both authentic and simplified materials would be best. → Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Evidence

Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Amir Mahdavi Zhafarghandi, Behzad Barekat, & Sepideh Homaei. (2014). A Survey of Iranian EFL Teachers' and Learners' Perceptions Toward Authentic Listening Materials at University Level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.4p.184

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Table 2 reports teacher preferences for material type: 24 of 30 teachers (80%) chose both authentic and simplified, 3 chose authentic, 3 chose simplified. Descriptive survey result.

"As it is obvious, majority of the teachers (about 80%) believed that a listening class with both authentic and simplified materials would be the best one."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.