Claims

Teachers often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL scaffolding

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL and to what extent SRL scaffolding is needed for promoting lower vs. higher cognitive levels. → Charlotte Dignath 2021

Evidence

Charlotte Dignath 2021

Charlotte Dignath, Zemira Mevarech. (2021). Introduction to special issue mind the gap between research and practice in the area of teachers' support of metacognition and SRL. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09285-5

q2 · i? · review · r2

The editorial reports, citing Peeters et al. (2016), Zohar & Barzilai (2015) and Mevarech & Fan (2018), that teachers "often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL"; attributed second-hand.

"often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL (Peeters et al., 2016; Zohar & Barzilai, 2015) and to what extent SRL scaffolding is needed for promoting lower vs. higher cognitive levels (Mevarech & Fan, 2018)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teachers-misconceptions-srl-beneficiaries
title Teachers often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL scaffolding
description Teachers often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL scaffolding
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — charlotte-dignath-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.