Latent profile analysis of primary teachers' SRL competence yields two quantitative profiles (low vs. high competence) rather than three qualitatively distinct situative, cognitive, or mixed profiles¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Latent profile analysis of 191 teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy regarding SRL promotion identified two profiles differing in level (low vs. high), not in qualitative pattern. → Charlotte Dignath 2021
Evidence¶
Charlotte Dignath 2021¶
Charlotte Dignath. (2021). For unto every one that hath shall be given: teachers' competence profiles regarding the promotion of self-regulated learning moderate the effectiveness of short-term teacher training. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09271-x
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Latent profile analysis of survey data from 191 German primary-school teachers (88.48% female) on knowledge, situative and cognitive beliefs, and self-efficacy for promoting SRL. "the latent profile analysis suggests two teacher profiles", with profile 1 (51%) low and profile 2 (48%) high on all four indicators; a two-class model was selected by BIC.
"the latent profile analysis suggests two teacher profiles. Profile 1 (51% of participants) was characterized by—relative to the mean of the total sample—low scores on both the beliefs about situative and cognitive approaches"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers' SRL competence profiles do not differ by gender, age, or teaching experience
- Teachers' initial SRL competence profiles moderate training effectiveness: initially high-competence teachers benefit more from training
- High-competence-profile teachers outperform low-competence-profile teachers on SRL knowledge, beliefs, and self-efficacy, but not on self-reported situated SRL approaches
- Teachers often hold misconceptions about which students benefit from SRL scaffolding — related
- Latent profile analysis of pre-service teachers' CT skills identifies three profiles (Novice, Developing, Proficient), revealing heterogeneous, non-linear skill acquisition — related
- Latent profile analysis of combined SR and OB factors identifies six distinct teacher profiles spanning overestimation, underestimation, and alignment — related
- Four distinct action-control belief profiles (agentic, moderate, avoidant, and mixed) emerge among Finnish ninth graders — related
- Interest profiles combine homogeneous and heterogeneous patterns across the six dimensions — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
two-srl-teacher-competence-profiles-low-high |
title |
Latent profile analysis of primary teachers' SRL competence yields two quantitative profiles (low vs. high competence) rather than three qualitatively distinct situative, cognitive, or mixed profiles |
description |
Latent profile analysis of primary teachers' SRL competence yields two quantitative profiles (low vs. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
recheck_by |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — charlotte-dignath-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.