Claims

Teachers have far more power to shape what happens to students than investors or scouts, partly through their opinions of each child

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Teacher influence on students is driven in part by teacher opinions of each child, making educational analytics use riskier than industrial use. → James Soland 2015

Evidence

James Soland 2015

James Soland. (2015). Is Moneyball the next big thing in education? Phi Delta Kappan 96(4), 64–67. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/is-moneyball-the-next-big-thing-in-education/ doi:10.1177/0031721714561450

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The abstract argues, with no supporting data, that "Teachers also have far more power to shape what happens to students," an influence it attributes partly to their opinions of each child.

"Teachers also have far more power to shape what happens to students, an influence driven in part by their opinions of each child."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teachers-shape-student-outcomes-through-opinions
title Teachers have far more power to shape what happens to students than investors or scouts, partly through their opinions of each child
description Teachers have far more power to shape what happens to students than investors or scouts, partly through their opinions of each child
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — james-soland-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.