Teachers' judgments of students' monitoring accuracy deviated 14.33% from students' actual monitoring accuracy, tending to underestimate it¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the exploratory study, teachers' judgments of students' judgment accuracy deviated 14.33% from the actual accuracy of students' own monitoring judgments, with a tendency to underestimate students' monitoring accuracy. → van de Pol 2024

Evidence¶

van de Pol 2024¶

van de Pol, J., & Oudman, S. (2024). Teachers' judgment accuracy of students' monitoring skills: a conceptual and methodological framework and explorative study. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-023-09349-8

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Explorative study in which 46 secondary education teachers judged nine of their own students (total sample of 406 students) on a reading comprehension test. The article reports the deviation of '14.33%' with a tendency to underestimate students' monitoring accuracy; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Teachers' judgments of students' judgment accuracy deviated 14.33% from the actual accuracy of students' own monitoring judgments, with a tendency to underestimate their students' monitoring accuracy."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Teachers' judgments of students' performance deviated 21.96% from students' actual performance, tending to overestimate it — related
• A brief cue-diagnosticity intervention did not significantly improve teachers' judgment accuracy, presumably because accuracy was already relatively high — related