Claims

A focused effective-teaching seminar alone did not improve feedback frequency: the seminar-only and control groups provided similar amounts of feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Teachers who received only the four-hour effective teaching seminar gave feedback at levels similar to the untreated control group. → Andrews 2011

Evidence

Andrews 2011

Andrews, A., Bobo, L., & Spurlock, A. (2011). Use of video feedback in the training of pre-service teachers. Journal of Instructional Pedagogies. (no URL printed in the article text). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1056349

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the randomized eight-week experiment, the seminar-only group (Group Two) and control group (Group Three) showed no significant pairwise difference in total feedback in Table 3; the article states "provided similar amounts of feedback to their students". Equivalence was not formally tested.

"The two groups, seminar and control, provided similar amounts of feedback to their students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.