Teaching between study phases contributes to comprehension more than teaching after the study phase¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In-between non-interactive teaching benefited comprehension more than after-study teaching, an effect mediated by increased metacognitive monitoring. → Lachner 2022
Evidence¶
Lachner 2022¶
Lachner, A., Hoogerheide, V., van Gog, T., & Renkl, A. (2022). Learning-by-Teaching Without Audience Presence or Interaction: When and Why Does it Work? Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09643-4
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review's timing boundary-condition section describes Lachner et al. (2020), two experiments in which university students taught between two study phases or after both, with no overall teaching-versus-retrieval effect. Table 1 reports η²p = .06 for the timing contrast on recall; the quoted prose carries no effect size, so impact is null.
"However, teaching between the study phase contributed to students' comprehension more than teaching after the study phase. Analyses of the generated explanations showed that the effect of early explaining was mediated by an increase in students' metacognitive monitoring."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Metacognitive strategy instruction, which includes comprehension monitoring, improves academic performance by a medium amount, and in one non-randomised study comprehension-monitoring training raised low achievers' reading scores — a broader claim this one bears on
- Self-reported metacognitive regulation of reading contributes to expository digital text comprehension in a home e-learning environment — related
- Metacognitive prompts improve learning — related
- Worked-example preparation deepens subsequent learning via more elaboration during the future-learning phase — related
- In-between explaining enhanced university students' conceptual knowledge more than after-study explaining (Experiment 1) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teaching-timing-between-study-phases |
title |
Teaching between study phases contributes to comprehension more than teaching after the study phase |
description |
Teaching between study phases contributes to comprehension more than teaching after the study phase |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — lachner-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.