Self-reported metacognitive regulation of reading contributes to expository digital text comprehension in a home e-learning environment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students with more Global/Monitoring metacognitive skills were more likely to correctly answer comprehension questions about hypertexts read at home. → Burin 2020
Evidence¶
Burin 2020¶
Burin, Debora Ines; Gonzalez, Federico Martin; Barreyro, Juan Pablo; Injoque Ricle, Irene. (2020). Metacognitive regulation contributes to digital text comprehension in E-learning. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-020-09226-8
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Study of 219 college students reading two low previous knowledge hypertexts at home in an e-learning environment, with a metacognitive inventory referred to the tasks just completed. The article reports that "more Global/Monitor metacognitive skills" increased the likelihood of correctly answering comprehension questions; no effect size is printed.
"Students with more verbal ability, more Global/Monitor metacognitive skills, and more Internet experience were more likely to correctly answer comprehension questions."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Metacognition — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
- Self-Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Verbal ability and Internet experience predict correct answering of comprehension questions about digital texts in e-learning — related
- The metacognitive scale yields two factors: Global/Monitoring and Problem Solving — related
- Metacognitive strategy instruction, which includes comprehension monitoring, improves academic performance by a medium amount, and in one non-randomised study comprehension-monitoring training raised low achievers' reading scores — a broader claim this one bears on
- Metacognitive prompts improve learning — related
- Teaching between study phases contributes to comprehension more than teaching after the study phase — related
- Metacognitive activity scores were neither associated with verbal ability nor with Internet experience — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
metacognitive-regulation-digital-text-comprehension-elearning |
title |
Self-reported metacognitive regulation of reading contributes to expository digital text comprehension in a home e-learning environment |
description |
Self-reported metacognitive regulation of reading contributes to expository digital text comprehension in a home e-learning environment |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — burin-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.