Claims

Attitudes reflective of cooperation account for 37% of the variance in team learning, with psychological safety, cohesion, and trust prominent but understudied

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Attitudinal contributions to team learning overall show rho = .61 (37% variance); psychological safety (rho = .86, 74%), cohesion (rho = .66, 44%), and trust (rho = .52, 27%) are prominent. → Robert A. Sottilare 2018

Evidence

Robert A. Sottilare 2018

Robert A. Sottilare, C. Shawn Burke, Eduardo Salas, Anne M. Sinatra, Joan H. Johnston, Stephen B. Gilbert. (2018). Designing Adaptive Instruction for Teams: a Meta-Analysis. Int J Artif Intell Educ 28:225–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-017-0146-z

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analytic synthesis of attitudinal contributions to team learning (Table 6), based on very few studies (overall k = 5, N = 523) with overall rho = .61; the article reports "attitudes reflective of cooperation account for 37% of the variance in team learning" and calls for future research to strengthen confidence.

"Not surprisingly, attitudes reflective of cooperation account for 37% of the variance in team learning (Table 6). The role of psychological safety (74%), cohesion (44%), and trust (27%) becomes evident, but the issue of number of studies remains."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.