Claims

Team reflection relates positively to team performance over time, but knowledge sharing and team activity do not

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2–r3 · q2 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Team reflection shows positive relationships with team performance factors efficiency, effectiveness and quality over time, but not with innovativeness. → Andreas Widmann 2025 q2 i0 No significant relationship over time was found between knowledge sharing or team activity and team performance. → Andreas Widmann 2025 (2)

Evidence

Andreas Widmann 2025

Andreas Widmann, Regina H. Mulder. (2025). Change in team learning behaviours in work teams – A systematic review. Educational Research Review 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100736

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of longitudinal studies of natural work teams reporting temporal relationships between team learning behaviours and outcomes. The review reports "positive relationships between team reflection and team performance" for efficiency, effectiveness and quality but not innovativeness; no effect sizes are printed for this synthesis statement.

"The studies indicate positive relationships between team reflection and team performance for the three factors efficiency, effectiveness (Buljac & Van Woerkom, 2015) and quality (Bednall et al., 2014) but not for innovativeness (Buljac & Van Woerkom, 2015)."

Andreas Widmann 2025 (2)

Andreas Widmann, Regina H. Mulder. (2025). Change in team learning behaviours in work teams – A systematic review. Educational Research Review 49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100736

q2 · i0 · review · r2

The review's synthesis of longitudinal studies found "no significant relationship was found over time" between knowledge sharing or team activity and team performance. Equivalence was not tested; the null is reported as the review states it.

"Between both knowledge sharing and team activity and team performance no significant relationship was found over time (Bednall et al., 2014; Knight, 2015)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id team-reflection-performance-over-time
title Team reflection relates positively to team performance over time, but knowledge sharing and team activity do not
description Team reflection relates positively to team performance over time, but knowledge sharing and team activity do not
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — andreas-widmann-2025, andreas-widmann-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.