Technical reframings of AIED criticism fail to address the fundamental political questions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Engineering responses such as explainable AI, representative training data, ethics codes, and fairness commitments do not address the politics, power and social harm at the heart of the AI backlash. → Neil Selwyn 2023

Evidence¶

Neil Selwyn 2023¶

Neil Selwyn. (2023). Constructive Criticism? Working with (Rather than Against) the AIED Back-Lash. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00344-3

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Authors' interpretation in the conclusions section of the commentary, referring to the tendency of AI specialists to reframe critics' concerns as technical problems solvable through explainable AI, ethics codes, privacy pledges, or commitments to fairness, accountability and transparency.

"While well-intentioned, none of these changes do much to address the fundamental questions of politics, power, institutionalised injustice and social harm that lie at the heart of the current AI backlash."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Existing institutional AI literacy frameworks converge on a consumer model with no substantive treatment of training data politics or governance participation — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• AI systems are non-neutral socio-technical artifacts embedding cultural assumptions and power relations — a broader claim this one bears on
• Surveyed professionals show strong technical AI awareness but limited ethical and governance readiness — related
• Iterative coding of 27 AIL sources yields seven dimensions, with technical, application and critical-thinking dimensions most frequent and legal/regulatory knowledge rarest — related
• Ethical reflection is often addressed separately from technical and creative AI activities, showing weak co-occurrence with Social Reasoning (42%), Using AI (41%) and Creating with AI (55%) — related
• Current algorithmic approaches typically address isolated problems and fail to break the recursive constraint — a narrower finding that bears on this claim