Claims

Technology-supported teaching of global-education attainments produced higher post-test academic achievement than teacher-centered direct instruction in 6th-grade social studies

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test scores of the experimental group were significantly higher than those of the control group on the academic achievement test. → Egüz 2019

Evidence

Egüz 2019

Egüz, Ş., Öztürk, C. & Kesten, A. (2019). Technology-supported global education: A mixed method study. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 9(4), 1209-1244. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.040

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Semi-experimental unbalanced pre-test post-test control group study with 44 experimental and 41 control 6th graders; Mann-Whitney U comparison of post-test scores showed "a significant difference ... in favor of the experimental group" (rank means 56.41 vs 28.61); no effect size printed.

"it was found that there was a significant difference between the post -test scores of the students in the experimental and control groups for the Academic Achievement Test [U = 312.00, p<.05]"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.