Claims

TEDDICS comprises three factors — accessing, evaluating, and sharing and communicating digital information — best represented by ESEM rather than CFA

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The hypothesized three-factor structure of TEDDICS was supported by ESEM, which fit the data better than CFA. → Siddiq F. 2015

Evidence

Siddiq F. 2015

Siddiq F., Scherer R. & Tondeur J. (2015). Teachers’ Emphasis on Developing Students’ Digital Information and Communication Skills (TEDDICS): A New Construct in 21st Century Education. Computers & Education. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.006

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Structural equation modeling analysis of the ICILS 2013 Norwegian teacher sample (N = 1,072) comparing CFA and ESEM measurement models of TEDDICS. The article reports that "ESEM significantly outperformed the CFA model" on the printed fit-change indices.

"Moreover, ESEM significantly outperformed the CFA model (∆RMSEA = -.025, ∆CFI = +.061, ∆TLI = +.062) and was thus accepted."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teddics-three-factor-esem-structure
title TEDDICS comprises three factors — accessing, evaluating, and sharing and communicating digital information — best represented by ESEM rather than CFA
description TEDDICS comprises three factors — accessing, evaluating, and sharing and communicating digital information — best represented by ESEM rather than CFA
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — siddiq-f-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.