Claims

The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? An aptitude–treatment interaction analysis found no evidence that the intervention effect depended on students' writing proficiency. → Bouwer 2018

Evidence

Bouwer 2018

Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a Strategy-Focused Instructional Program on the Writing Quality of Upper Elementary Students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Aptitude–treatment interaction analysis regressing posttest on pretest scores per group; the regression coefficients were 0.60 (SE = 0.02) for Group 1 and 0.59 (SE = 0.03) for Group 2, a nonsignificant difference (t = 0.20, p = .42). No effect size is printed.

"Hence, the results did not show an aptitude treatment interaction, indicating the effects of the intervention did not depend on students’ writing proficiency."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tekster-effect-independent-of-writing-proficiency
title The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency
description The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — bouwer-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.