The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? An aptitude–treatment interaction analysis found no evidence that the intervention effect depended on students' writing proficiency. → Bouwer 2018
Evidence¶
Bouwer 2018¶
Bouwer, R., Koster, M., & van den Bergh, H. (2018). Effects of a Strategy-Focused Instructional Program on the Writing Quality of Upper Elementary Students in the Netherlands. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(1), 58–71. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000206
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Aptitude–treatment interaction analysis regressing posttest on pretest scores per group; the regression coefficients were 0.60 (SE = 0.02) for Group 1 and 0.59 (SE = 0.03) for Group 2, a nonsignificant difference (t = 0.20, p = .42). No effect size is printed.
"Hence, the results did not show an aptitude treatment interaction, indicating the effects of the intervention did not depend on students’ writing proficiency."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The effect of Tekster does not depend on student gender — related
- Effectiveness of pedagogical tools depends on learners' initial grasp of the object of learning (aptitude–treatment interaction) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Empirical patterns of the expertise reversal effect fit those found in Aptitude Treatment Interaction studies initiated in the mid-60s — related
- Aptitude-by-treatment interactions for instructional structure show mixed support: crossovers in some studies, nulls in others — related
- ATI research using static aptitude measures has yielded remarkably sparse robust results — related
- Language proficiency moderates the effect of non-interactive teaching on immediate monitoring accuracy — related
- Tekster, a strategy-focused writing instruction program, statistically significantly improves the writing quality of upper-elementary students, with an overall effect size of 0.32 — related
- Writing quality gains from Tekster are maintained eight weeks after the intervention ends — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tekster-effect-independent-of-writing-proficiency |
title |
The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency |
description |
The effect of Tekster does not depend on students' initial writing proficiency |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bouwer-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.