Claims

Language proficiency moderates the effect of non-interactive teaching on immediate monitoring accuracy

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the IPD synthesis, immediate monitoring accuracy depended on students' language proficiency. → Lachner 2025

Evidence

Lachner 2025

Lachner, A., Russ, H., Hübner, N., Sibley, L., & Scheiter, K. (2025). When Does Learning by Non-interactive Teaching Work? A Large-Scale Analysis of Learner Characteristics in a Classroom Setting. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10060-0

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Exploratory aptitude-treatment interaction analysis within the one-stage IPD meta-analytic framework (N = 1074), testing nine learner characteristics simultaneously; the reported interaction shows "Immediate monitoring accuracy depended on language proficiency".

"However, the effectiveness of non-interactive teaching varied by learner characteristics: Immediate monitoring accuracy depended on language proficiency."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id language-proficiency-moderates-monitoring-accuracy
title Language proficiency moderates the effect of non-interactive teaching on immediate monitoring accuracy
description Language proficiency moderates the effect of non-interactive teaching on immediate monitoring accuracy
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lachner-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.