All ten sub-factors of the L2 motivational self-system correlate significantly and positively with L2 self-efficacy¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 Each of the ten motivation sub-factors shows a significant positive correlation with self-efficacy, ranging from r = 0.19 (integrativeness) to r = 0.37 (criterion measures). → Roshandel 2018
Evidence¶
Roshandel 2018¶
Roshandel, J., Ghonsooly, B., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). L2 Motivational Self-System and Self-Efficacy: A Quantitative Survey-Based Study. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 329-344. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11123a
q2 · i2 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of the survey data from 210 EFL learners (Table 4) found significant correlations between each motivation sub-factor and self-efficacy; the remaining sub-factors Culture (r = 0.26), ATL2C (r = 0.27), and Integrative (r = 0.19) were also significant at p < 0.05.
"Criterion (r = 0.37, p < 0.05), Ideal ( r = 0.34, p < 0.05), Ought (r = 0.29, p < 0.05), Family (r = 0.21, p < 0.05), InsPre ( r = 0.20, p < 0.05), InsPro ( r = 0.35, p < 0.05), ATLE ( r = 0.36, p < 0.05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In the L2MSS, the L2 learning experience predicts intended effort most strongly, while the ideal L2 self is weaker than the theory argues — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Ideal L2 self positively and significantly predicts student self-efficacy, generalizing prior qualitative findings quantitatively — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- In the motivational profile of Iranian EFL learners, instrumentality-promotion received the highest mean, followed by ideal L2 self — related
- Overall L2 motivation is a significant positive predictor of L2 self-efficacy among Iranian EFL learners — related
- Criterion measures, attitudes towards learning English, instrumentality promotion, and ideal L2 self are the strongest predictors of L2 self-efficacy — related
- Motivation correlates positively and significantly with L2 willingness to communicate among Turkish EFL preparatory students — related
- Self-efficacy correlates positively with subsequent motivation and performance across cognitive and sport domains — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
ten-motivation-subfactors-correlate-self-efficacy |
title |
All ten sub-factors of the L2 motivational self-system correlate significantly and positively with L2 self-efficacy |
description |
All ten sub-factors of the L2 motivational self-system correlate significantly and positively with L2 self-efficacy |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — roshandel-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.