Only 10 of 211 SRL scale items were feasible to operationalize as learning analytics indicators in an LMS¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Out of 211 items from four validated SRL scales, only 10 items (less than 5%) were deemed feasible to be measured using learning analytics. → de Barba 2025

Evidence¶

de Barba 2025¶

de Barba, P. G., Oliveira, E. A., & English, N. (2025). Development and validation of a learning analytics rubric for self-regulated learning. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10521-x

q2 · i? · design · r2

In Phase 1 of this design-based research, two researchers independently assessed the feasibility of translating each of 211 SRL scale items into Canvas LMS data indicators. Initial inter-rater agreement was low (Kappa = 0.11), with discrepancies focused on discussion forum analytics items. After consensus review, ten items were identified as suitable.

"Overall, ten items (less than 5%) were deemed feasible to be measured using learning analytics out of the 211 items initially considered."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• An ACO-derived 12-item short form (GenAI-SRL-12) retains the full scale's factor structure, reliability, and construct equivalence — related
• The TQsrl and SQsrl questionnaires are validated instruments measuring SRL sub-processes with emphasis on reflection — related
• The GenAI-SRL scale achieves measurement invariance across gender groups at metric and scalar levels — related