Peer-reviewed literature on Two-Eyed Seeing in P-20 education is concentrated in Canada and published between 2009 and 2021¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Of the 13 articles in the systematic mapping, 69% were authored exclusively by Canadian researchers, and all included articles were published between 2009 and 2021. → Gardner-Vandy 2025

Evidence¶

Gardner-Vandy 2025¶

Gardner-Vandy, K., Utley, J., Just, A., Hathcock, S., & Stansberry, S. (2025). A Systematic Mapping Literature Review on Two-Eyed Seeing in P-20 Education. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251329570

q2 · i? · review · r2

Content analysis of the 13 included articles in this systematic mapping literature review characterized publication outlets and geographic locations. The authors report that "all articles included in the review were published between 2009 and 2021" and that 69% were authored exclusively by researchers in Canada, where TES originated.

"Although no restrictions were placed on the publication dates, all articles included in the review were published between 2009 and 2021 (see Figure 2). Of the articles, 69% were authored by researchers exclusively in Canada"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• TES literature in P-20 education is concentrated in science education and post-secondary settings — related
• Research studies on TES in P-20 education rely almost entirely on qualitative methods with sparse methodological detail — related
• Reviewed articles identify tokenism, resource limitations, loss of Elders, and emotional-political challenges as risks in using TES — related
• Included research studies suggest TES with land-based and experiential pedagogies deepens student engagement in post-secondary education — related