Under the i3 scale-up grant, TFA planned to grow its corps by 80 percent and aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated highly effective by the 2014-2015 school year¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2018: local conditions change quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? TFA's i3 scale-up plan set a goal of growing its corps by 80 percent and aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated as highly effective by the 2014-2015 school year. → Zukiewicz 2015
Evidence¶
Zukiewicz 2015¶
Zukiewicz, M., Clark, M. A., & Makowsky, L. (2015). Implementation of the Teach For America Investing in Innovation Scale-Up. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/implementation-of-the-teach-for-america-investing-in-innovation-scaleup
q2 · i? · design · r?
The report describes the goals TFA set under the i3 scale-up grant: a planned "corps by 80 percent" growth and an aim for a majority of teachers to be rated "highly effective" by 2014-2015.
"Under the i3 scale-up grant, TFA planned to grow its corps by 80 percent and it aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated as “highly effective” by the 2014–2015 school year."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- During the first two years of the i3 scale-up, TFA expanded its corps by 25 percent but fell short of annual targets for increasing the number of teachers and teacher effectiveness — related
- TFA corps members hired in the first two years of the i3 scale-up were as effective as other teachers in the same high-poverty schools in teaching reading and math — related
- TFA teachers in their first two years of teaching are more effective than more experienced non-TFA teachers in the same schools — related
- TFA secondary math teachers increase student math achievement by 0.07 standard deviations over one school year relative to other math teachers in the same schools — related
- Teaching by first- or second-year TFA corps members shows no significant effect on elementary-grade students' reading compared with non-TFA novice teachers — related
- A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement — related
- TFA teachers have positive effects on mathematics achievement for students in grades pre-K-12, based on six studies — related
- TFA shows a small positive effect on reading for early elementary students (PreK to grade 2) but not in math — related
- The authors propose creating America's Teacher Corps through federal legislation to recognize highly effective K-12 public school teachers — related
- As it scaled, TFA generally maintained fidelity to its core program model, with small changes to its pre-service training program — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tfa-i3-grant-growth-and-effectiveness-goals |
title |
Under the i3 scale-up grant, TFA planned to grow its corps by 80 percent and aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated highly effective by the 2014-2015 school year |
description |
Under the i3 scale-up grant, TFA planned to grow its corps by 80 percent and aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated highly effective by the 2014-2015 school year |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
recheck_by |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zukiewicz-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.