A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-10-08 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? In the Clark et al. (2013) randomized controlled trial, students assigned to TFA math teachers scored significantly higher than students assigned to non-TFA comparison teachers in the same schools. → Teach For America 2016

Evidence¶

Teach For America 2016¶

Teach For America. (2016). WWC Intervention Report: Teach For America. What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. https://www.teachforamerica.org

q3 · i? · review · r3

This RCT randomly assigned students in 45 secondary schools to a math class taught by a TFA teacher or a similar class taught by a non-TFA teacher; the analytic sample included 4,573 students. The report states: "The authors reported, and the WWC confirmed, a positive and statistically significant difference between the TFA group and the comparison group", with an average improvement index of +3.

"The authors reported, and the WWC confirmed, a positive and statistically significant difference between the TFA group and the comparison group."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• An elementary-school RCT found no statistically significant difference between TFA and non-TFA teachers in mathematics or reading achievement — related
• A lottery-based randomized controlled trial of KIPP middle schools found statistically significant positive effects on state math and reading tests — related
• TFA teachers have positive effects on mathematics achievement for students in grades pre-K-12, based on six studies — a broader claim this one bears on
• This is the first large-scale experimental study of secondary math teachers from Teach For America — related
• TFA teachers in their first two years of teaching are more effective than more experienced non-TFA teachers in the same schools — related
• Secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs are as effective as teachers receiving traditional certification — reports the opposite
• In some cases, Teach For America and Teaching Fellows secondary math teachers are more effective than traditionally certified math teachers — a broader claim this one bears on
• Students with alternatively certified teachers did no worse on achievement tests than students with traditionally certified teachers — related
• Teaching by first- or second-year TFA corps members shows no significant effect on elementary-grade students' reading compared with non-TFA novice teachers — related
• Prior experimental studies of TFA consistently showed a positive, statistically significant effect on student math achievement but no discernable effect on reading — a broader claim this one bears on
• The findings contradict claims that alternative teacher preparation programs such as Teach For America harm students — a broader claim this one bears on
• Teach For America teachers had no impact on student reading achievement — related
• Teach For America teachers had a positive impact on student math achievement of about 15 percent of a standard deviation, equivalent to about one month of instruction — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
• A program is said to have an effect when the difference between program and non-program groups is statistically significant — a broader claim this one bears on
• TFA corps members hired in the first two years of the i3 scale-up were as effective as other teachers in the same high-poverty schools in teaching reading and math — related
• Under the i3 scale-up grant, TFA planned to grow its corps by 80 percent and aimed for a majority of its teachers to be rated highly effective by the 2014-2015 school year — related
• Secondary math students taught by Teaching Fellows teachers had test scores similar to peers taught by traditional-route teachers — related
• Secondary math students taught by Teach For America teachers outperformed peers taught by traditional-route teachers by 0.06 standard deviations — related
• Within-school random assignment studies such as the TFA evaluation are challenging but may be feasible and generate useful evidence — related
• The authors propose creating America's Teacher Corps through federal legislation to recognize highly effective K-12 public school teachers — related
• Students of certified teachers outperformed students of under-certified teachers, including TFA teachers, on all three SAT-9 subtests in low-income districts — reports the opposite
• Students of TFA teachers did not perform significantly differently from students of other under-certified teachers — reports the opposite
• Study designs that randomly assign students within schools involve trade-offs, illustrated by the Teach For America evaluation experience — related
• TFA teachers in grades 1 and 2 had a positive effect on math achievement of 0.16 standard deviations that was almost statistically significant (p-value = 0.054) — related
• TFA teachers show potentially positive effects on science achievement, based on one study — related
• Teach For America teachers had no impacts on other outcomes such as attendance, promotion, or disciplinary incidents — related