Teach For America teachers had no impact on student reading achievement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the randomized experiment, students taught by TFA teachers showed no impact on reading achievement relative to comparison teachers. → Steven Glazerman 2006
Evidence¶
Steven Glazerman 2006¶
Steven Glazerman, Daniel Mayer, Paul Decker. (2006). Alternative Routes to Teaching: The Impacts of Teach For America on Student Achievement and Other Outcomes. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, vol. 25, no. 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/alternative-routes-to-teaching-the-impacts-of-teach-for-america-on-student-achievement-and-other-outcomes doi:10.1002/pam.20157
q3 · i? · causal · r?
Randomized experiment on the impact of Teach For America on student achievement. The study reports "no impact on reading achievement" for TFA teachers; no effect size for reading is printed.
"TFA teachers had a positive impact on math achievement and no impact on reading achievement."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The findings contradict claims that alternative teacher preparation programs such as Teach For America harm students — related
- Teach For America teachers had no impacts on other outcomes such as attendance, promotion, or disciplinary incidents — related
- Teach For America teachers had a positive impact on student math achievement of about 15 percent of a standard deviation, equivalent to about one month of instruction — related
- A randomized controlled trial found TFA secondary math teachers outperformed non-TFA comparison teachers in mathematics achievement — related
- TFA teachers have positive effects on mathematics achievement for students in grades pre-K-12, based on six studies — related
- Secondary math teachers from Teach For America and the Teaching Fellows programs are as effective as teachers receiving traditional certification — related
- Teach For America teachers were more likely than their peers to report problems with student behavior — related
- In some cases, Teach For America and Teaching Fellows secondary math teachers are more effective than traditionally certified math teachers — related
- TFA teachers in lower elementary grades (prekindergarten through grade 2) had a positive, statistically significant effect on reading achievement of 0.12 standard deviations — reports the opposite
- Students of certified teachers outperformed students of under-certified teachers, including TFA teachers, on all three SAT-9 subtests in low-income districts — related
- Secondary math students taught by Teach For America teachers outperformed peers taught by traditional-route teachers by 0.06 standard deviations — related
- TFA teachers in grades 1 and 2 had a positive effect on math achievement of 0.16 standard deviations that was almost statistically significant (p-value = 0.054) — related
- No statistically significant TFA impacts were found for upper elementary grades (3 through 5) in reading or math or for other examined subgroups — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tfa-no-reading-achievement-impact |
title |
Teach For America teachers had no impact on student reading achievement |
description |
Teach For America teachers had no impact on student reading achievement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2006 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steven-glazerman-2006 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.