Claims

In the RCT, the average effect across knowledge, attitudes, and values outcomes was substantively important (0.35) but not statistically significant, with several individual outcomes null

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2006 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The average effect size across all knowledge, attitudes, and values outcomes in the RCT was 0.35, substantively important by WWC criteria but not statistically significant. → What Works Clearinghouse 2006 q3 i? In the RCT, positive attitudes toward nonviolence, assertiveness, goal setting, and intentions for marijuana and fighting were not statistically significant. → What Works Clearinghouse 2006

Evidence

What Works Clearinghouse 2006

What Works Clearinghouse, U.S. Department of Education. (2006). WWC Intervention Report: Too Good for Drugs and Violence. https://www.mendezfoundation.org

q3 · i? · causal · r?

WWC aggregation of all Bacon (2001a) outcomes in the randomized controlled trial. Appendix A3 prints the study average as "0.35 ns +14"; individual outcomes including nonviolence attitudes (0.33) and assertiveness (0.29) were marked ns.

"The average effect size across all outcomes in this study in the knowledge, attitudes, and values domain was large enough to be considered substantively important using WWC criteria, although it was not statistically significant."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tgfdv-rct-average-effect-not-significant
title In the RCT, the average effect across knowledge, attitudes, and values outcomes was substantively important (0.35) but not statistically significant, with several individual outcomes null
description In the RCT, the average effect across knowledge, attitudes, and values outcomes was substantively important (0.35) but not statistically significant, with several individual outcomes null
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2006
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — what-works-clearinghouse-2006

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.