Claims

TGfU implementations in schools are typically short-term, which the review judges too short to achieve significant outcomes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Most reviewed TGfU implementations lasted below 9 or between 12 and 16 lessons, based on a single unit or part of it. → Barba-Martín Raúl A. 2020 q3 i? The review concludes the implementation of the model is carried out in too short a time to achieve significant outcomes. → Barba-Martín Raúl A. 2020

Evidence

Barba-Martín Raúl A. 2020

Barba-Martín Raúl A., Bores-García Daniel, Hortigüela-Alcalá David, González-Calvo Gustavo. (2020). The Application of the Teaching Games for Understanding in Physical Education. Systematic Review of the Last Six Years. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093330

q3 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of the 12 studies' durations groups them into blocks below 9 lessons, between 12 and 16 lessons, and above 18 lessons of 40–60 min, with most research in the first two blocks and all but one study based on a single unit. The authors state "The implementation of the model is carried out in too short a time to achieve significant outcomes".

"The implementation of the model is carried out in too short a time to achieve significant outcomes."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.