Claims

The TGT experimental group significantly outperformed the lecture-based control group on the mathematics posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After the intervention, the experimental group's posttest mean (24.56, SD = 12.71) exceeded the control group's (9.65, SD = 5.81), a difference the article reports as significant. → Abdus Salam 2015

Evidence

Abdus Salam 2015

Abdus Salam, Anwar Hossain, & Shahidur Rahman. (2015). Effects of using Teams Games Tournaments (TGT) Cooperative Technique for Learning Mathematics in Secondary Schools of Bangladesh. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(3). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1085938

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Between-group comparison from the quasi-experiment's results (Table 1): the experimental group's "posttest mean score ... was 24.56 (SD = 12.71)" versus the control group's 9.65 (SD = 5.81), reported as a significant difference.

"the reported posttest mean score for the experimental group was 24.56 (SD = 12.71) compared to the control group of 9.65 ( SD = 5.81) which showed a remarkable and significant difference in scores."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.