Claims

Students in Cooperative TGT classrooms learned to socialise while learning mathematics and became more active learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The article reports that students in cooperative TGT classrooms learned to socialise while learning mathematics and shared their understanding with team members and peers. → Veloo 2016

Evidence

Veloo 2016

Veloo, A., Md-Ali, R., & Chairany, S. (2016). Using Cooperative Teams-Game-Tournament in 11 Religious School to Improve Mathematics Understanding and Communication. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 97-123. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1134733

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Authors' interpretive conclusion from the intervention study at the religious school in Riau, contrasting TGT students with conventional-approach students described as more individualistic and reserved. No effect size or test statistic is printed for this social outcome.

"Students in the cooperative TGT classrooms, however, had learned to socialise while learning mathematics. They no longer only concentrated on their own learning but instead shared their mathematics understanding with their team members as well as their other classroom peers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.