The ThinkForward pilot cost £2426.50 per pupil per year, high compared with other interventions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? ThinkForward costs were high relative to other interventions at £2426.50 per pupil per year during the pilot, though costs have since been reduced. → Demack et al. 2016
Evidence¶
Demack et al. 2016¶
Sean Demack, Colin McCaig, Claire Wolstenholme, Anna Stevens and Laura Fumagalli. (2016). ThinkForward: Evaluation report and executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evaluation/projects/think-forward
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Cost analysis reported in the executive summary. The report adds that costs have since been reduced, schools often do not pay for the entire intervention themselves, but the high cost could make recruiting schools to a large school-level trial expensive.
"The costs of ThinkForward are high in comparison to other interventions, with a cost of £2426.50 per pupil per year during the pilot."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The ThinkForward pilot RCT found no evidence of impact on GCSE scores, absences, or attitudes — related
- The ThinkForward approach was not ready for a large school-level randomised controlled trial — related
- The Discover Summer School was relatively expensive compared to other literacy catch-up approaches, at an estimated cost of about £1,790 per pupil — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.