Cluster analysis of instructors identifies three user groups that differ in several AI literacy dimensions, with the ethics scale providing a clear distinction¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Cluster analysis of instructors identified three user groups that differed in several literacy dimensions. → Fekete 2026 q3 i? The scale of ethics provided a clear distinction between the three instructor user groups. → Fekete 2026

Evidence¶

Fekete 2026¶

Fekete, I. (2026). Between Promise and Practice: Bridging Ethical Artificial Intelligence Literacy Gaps Across Students, Educators, and Policy. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.53761/9fr5vw20

q3 · i? · associational · r?

Cluster analysis of the instructor sample (n = 256) from the questionnaire study; the analysis "identified three user groups that differed in several literacy dimensions", with ethics as the clearest distinguishing scale. No effect sizes or cluster sizes are printed.

"Cluster analysis of instructors identified three user groups that differed in several literacy dimensions, with the scale of ethics providing a clear distinction"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
• Cluster analysis identifies three stable learner profiles: Engaged and Literate, Uncritical Reliant, and Skeptical Minimal users — related
• Four distinct GenAI chatbot adoption personas emerge: Cautious Achievers, Skeptical Utilitarians, Disengaged Doubters, and Engaged Enthusiasts — related
• Cluster analysis identifies four tentative moral response profiles: Comfortable Adopters, Guilty Non-Users, Cautious Users, and Morally Distressed Avoiders — related