Three learning profiles emerge among university students: organized-deep, unorganized-deep, and dissonant¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? K-means cluster analysis of approaches to learning identified three profiles: organized students applying a deep approach (n = 230), unorganized students applying a deep approach (n = 113), and a dissonant profile scoring high on all approaches (n = 119). → Tuononen 2023

Evidence¶

Tuononen 2023¶

Tuononen, T., Hyytinen, H., Räisänen, M., Hailikari, T., & Parpala, A. (2023). Metacognitive awareness in relation to university students' learning profiles. Metacognition and Learning, 18, 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09314-x

q2 · i? · associational · r2

K-means cluster analysis on the three approaches-to-learning scales in the survey of 462 students. Table 3 prints cluster sizes of 230, 113 and 119; the third, the Dissonant profile, "comprised students who scored high on all approaches".

"The first, Organized students applying a deep approach, included students who scored the highest on the deep approach and organized studying and lowest on the unreflective approach. The second profile, Unorganized students applying a deep approach, included students who scored high on deep approach but the lowest on organized studying."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The dissonant profile scores lowest of all profiles on knowledge about cognition, but does not differ from the unorganized-deep profile on regulation of cognition — related
• Both metacognitive awareness dimensions correlate positively with deep approach and organized studying and negatively with an unreflective approach — related
• Exploratory K-means clustering identifies four heterogeneous student AI-user profiles differing in experience, competence, usefulness, trust, and control, but the solution's optimality and stability are not established — related
• Four distinct GenAI chatbot adoption personas emerge: Cautious Achievers, Skeptical Utilitarians, Disengaged Doubters, and Engaged Enthusiasts — related
• Four distinct session-level engagement types emerge in GenAI Tutor use: Deep, Shallow, Routine-Learning, and Exam-Driven — related
• K-means clustering of K–8 students' platform trace data yields seven distinct engagement profiles — related
• Two distinct group deliberation patterns emerge in response to regulation triggers: the Plan and Implementation Approach (PIA) and the Trials and Failure Approach (TFA) — related
• Among 32 dyads in an open-ended collaborative tabletop task, three behavioral clusters split into two learning (gainer) profiles and one non-learning profile despite similar task performance — related
• Three distinct learner profiles emerge from function art activities: Repetitivists, Simplists, and Multifunctionists — related
• Dissonant combinations of regulation and processing strategies impair performance, and dissonance produces affective strain — related
• Interest profiles combine homogeneous and heterogeneous patterns across the six dimensions — related