Interest profiles combine homogeneous and heterogeneous patterns across the six dimensions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The identified interest profiles consist of both homogeneous patterns (similar scores on all dimensions) and heterogeneous patterns characterized by interactions across dimensions. → Akkerman 2020
Evidence¶
Akkerman 2020¶
Akkerman, D. M., Vulperhorst, J. P., & Akkerman, S. F. (2020). A developmental extension to the multidimensional structure of interests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 183-203. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000361
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Descriptive structural finding from the latent profile analyses of the 204 students' interest reports: the six profiles at each time point include both homogeneous and heterogeneous dimensional patterns, which were then examined longitudinally. No effect size is printed.
"These profiles, consisting of both homogeneous (i.e., similar scores on all dimensions) and heterogeneous (i.e., characterized by interactions across dimensions) patterns of scores across the dimensions, were then investigated longitudinally to evaluate them within developmental theory."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Adolescents' math and L1 self-concept and interest development across Grades 7–9 is best described by a single homogeneous trajectory profile — related
- Latent profile analysis of primary teachers' SRL competence yields two quantitative profiles (low vs. high competence) rather than three qualitatively distinct situative, cognitive, or mixed profiles — related
- Three learning profiles emerge among university students: organized-deep, unorganized-deep, and dissonant — related
- Latent profile analysis of combined SR and OB factors identifies six distinct teacher profiles spanning overestimation, underestimation, and alignment — related
- Latent profile analyses of interest dimensions best support two nearly identical sets of six profiles at both time points — related
- Discrepancies hint at a novel and separate developmental trajectory of interests requiring further investigation — related
- Profile structures and transitions over time largely align with common descriptions of interest development — related
- Latent profile analysis of RIASEC interests in Dutch Grade 9 students reveals seven distinct vocational interest profiles — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
interest-profiles-homogeneous-and-heterogeneous-patterns |
title |
Interest profiles combine homogeneous and heterogeneous patterns across the six dimensions |
description |
Interest profiles combine homogeneous and heterogeneous patterns across the six dimensions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — akkerman-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.