Both interventions were implemented with high fidelity, good program coverage, high attendance, and low attrition¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Median overall fidelity was 96% in kindergarten, 94% in grade 1, and 96% in grade 2, with 72–91% of groups demonstrating at least 80% fidelity. → Foorman 2018

Evidence¶

Foorman 2018¶

Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., & Dombek, J. (2018). The relative impact of aligning Tier 2 intervention materials with classroom core reading materials in grades K–2. The Elementary School Journal, 118(3). https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/journals/esj

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Fidelity observations of each intervention group in fall and spring using checklists with interrater reliability above 82% (Krippendorff's alpha on 15% of observations); "72%t o 91% of groups" met at least 80% fidelity on reading and language components.

"The median overall fidelity across interventions was 96% in kin- dergarten, 94% in grade 1,a n d 96% in grade 2."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• PFS was implemented with high coach and teacher fidelity and child compliance, but parent compliance was low — related
• Implementation fidelity was defined as at least 85 percent student enrollment and at least 50 percent grade-level content coverage in ST Math — related
• Fidelity of implementation of early language curricula varies widely across teachers and studies — related