Claims

Time pressure degraded laparoscopic suturing performance and reduced PFC activity, while resilient trainees showed greater bilateral ventral PFC activation independent of experience level

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Under time pressure, performance scores decreased for all trainees, all reported greater task load, and PFC activity decreased, especially in junior trainees. → Toy 2022 q2 i? Trainees who maintained stable performance under time pressure showed greater bilateral ventral PFC activation, and stress sensitivity was unrelated to experience level and not captured by heart-rate variability or Surgical-TLX self-report. → Toy 2022 (2)

Evidence

Toy 2022

Toy, S., Huh, D. D., Materi, J., Nanavati, J., & Schwengel, D. A. (2022). Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review. Medical Education Online, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016357

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review attributes this fNIRS finding to Modi et al. (2018), examining temporal pressure on laparoscopic suturing performance and neurocognitive correlates of task load; the review reports the descriptive pattern with no effect size printed.

"Performance scores decreased for all trainees under time-pressure conditions when compared to self-pacing. All trainees reported greater task load under time pressure and showed decreased PFC activity, especially junior trainees."

Toy 2022 (2)

Toy, S., Huh, D. D., Materi, J., Nanavati, J., & Schwengel, D. A. (2022). Use of neuroimaging to measure neurocognitive engagement in health professions education: a scoping review. Medical Education Online, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2021.2016357

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review attributes this subsequent fNIRS study to the same group [65], comparing trainees who maintained stable performance under time pressure with those who did not; the review adds that stress sensitivity and performance degradation were unrelated to experience level and not captured by heart-rate variability or Surgical-TLX.

"Resilient trainees showed greater bilateral ventral PFC activation, suggesting better attentional control and vigilance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.