Participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services were low¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Although eligible, relatively few students participated in either Title I school choice or supplemental educational services. → Ron Zimmer 2007
Evidence¶
Ron Zimmer 2007¶
Ron Zimmer, Brian Gill, Paula Razquin, Kevin Booker, J.R. Lockwood, III. (2007). Title I School Choice, Supplemental Educational Services, and Student Achievement. State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume I. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/title-i-school-choice-supplemental-educational-services-and-student-achievement doi:10.7249/rp1265
q3 · i? · associational · r?
The report's abstract states that "participation rates were low" for both options, while participants came from the disadvantaged populations NCLB targets. No participation percentages are printed in the available text.
"Although participation rates were low, participants in school choice and supplemental educational services came from the disadvantaged populations that NCLB is intended to target."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Low participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services may be related to problems communicating with parents — related
- Eligibility for Title I public school choice grew fourfold, reaching 6.9 million students in 2006-2007 — related
- In 2004-2005, only about one percent of the nearly 6.2 million students eligible for Title I school choice used the option, while about 17 percent of eligible students used supplemental educational services — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Participation rates remained low: 1 percent for Title I public school choice and 17 percent for supplemental educational services — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Participants in both Title I options came from the disadvantaged populations NCLB targets — related
- More than 3.3 million students were eligible for Title I supplemental educational services in 2006-2007, a nearly sixfold increase — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
title-i-choice-ses-low-participation-rates |
title |
Participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services were low |
description |
Participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services were low |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ron-zimmer-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.