Participants in both Title I options came from the disadvantaged populations NCLB targets¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students participating in school choice and in supplemental educational services came from the disadvantaged populations that NCLB is intended to target. → Ron Zimmer 2007
Evidence¶
Ron Zimmer 2007¶
Ron Zimmer, Brian Gill, Paula Razquin, Kevin Booker, J.R. Lockwood, III. (2007). Title I School Choice, Supplemental Educational Services, and Student Achievement. State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume I. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/title-i-school-choice-supplemental-educational-services-and-student-achievement doi:10.7249/rp1265
q3 · i? · associational · r?
The report's abstract reports on "the characteristics of students participating in the two options" and concludes participants "came from the disadvantaged populations that NCLB is intended to target." No descriptive statistics are printed in the available text.
"participants in school choice and supplemental educational services came from the disadvantaged populations that NCLB is intended to target"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- In a subsample of large urban districts, the average achievement of schools chosen by Title I school choice users was consistently higher than the average achievement of the schools they came from — related
- Participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services were low — related
- In 2004-2005, only about one percent of the nearly 6.2 million students eligible for Title I school choice used the option, while about 17 percent of eligible students used supplemental educational services — related
- Low participation rates in Title I school choice and supplemental educational services may be related to problems communicating with parents — related
- Participation rates remained low: 1 percent for Title I public school choice and 17 percent for supplemental educational services — related
- More than 3.3 million students were eligible for Title I supplemental educational services in 2006-2007, a nearly sixfold increase — related
- Parents of students who used Title I school choice were largely satisfied with the new schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
title-i-participants-disadvantaged-populations |
title |
Participants in both Title I options came from the disadvantaged populations NCLB targets |
description |
Participants in both Title I options came from the disadvantaged populations NCLB targets |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — ron-zimmer-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.