Claims

Most surveyed teachers reported that TLC experiences deepened their understanding of the NGSS dimensions and 3D approaches

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Over 80 percent of surveyed teachers reported their 2016-17 TLCs deepened understanding of DCIs (84 percent), SEPs (80 percent), CCCs (81 percent), and 78 percent reported deepened understanding of using a 3D approach to build understanding of a phenomenon. → Tyler 2018

Evidence

Tyler 2018

Tyler, B., & DiRanna, K. (2018). Next Generation Science Standards in practice: Tools and processes used by the California NGSS Early Implementers. San Francisco, CA: WestEd. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED596757

q2 · i? · design · r2

Post-TLC teacher survey data reported in the TLC Early Implementers' Reaction section: 84, 80, and 81 percent respectively for DCIs, SEPs, and CCCs, with 78 percent for 3D approach understanding. Self-reported perceptions; no effect size printed.

"Specifically, over 80 percent of teachers felt their TLC experiences deepened their understanding of the disciplinary core ideas (DCIs), how to use science and engineering practices (SEPs) to teach science and engineering, and how to use the crosscutting concepts (CCCs) to teach science and engineering (84 percent, 80 percent, and 81 percent, respectively)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tlc-deepened-ngss-understanding
title Most surveyed teachers reported that TLC experiences deepened their understanding of the NGSS dimensions and 3D approaches
description Most surveyed teachers reported that TLC experiences deepened their understanding of the NGSS dimensions and 3D approaches
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2018
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — tyler-2018

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.