The time management intervention did not improve self-reported time management skills relative to control in skill-bucket analyses¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In Study 1, comparisons of treatment and control change within each skill bucket showed no significant interactions on time management facets. → Burrus et al. 2013

Evidence¶

Burrus et al. 2013¶

Jeremy Burrus, Teresa Jackson, Steven Holtzman, and Richard D. Roberts, Terri Mandigo. (2013). Examining the Efficacy of a Time Management Intervention for High School Students. ETS Research Report Series, ETS RR-13-25. https://search.ets.org/researcher/

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Study 1 quasiexperiment with 143 ninth-graders assigned by class to treatment or focal-local control; mixed-model ANOVAs compared facet changes by skill bucket. The article reports "no significant interactions, all ps >.17" across buckets.

"Once again, for this analysis there were no significant interactions, all ps >.17. This may not be surprising because, outside of the feedback, the intervention (i.e., homework assignments) was identical for all skill categories."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In Study 1 the treatment group's self-assessed meeting-deadlines skill decreased while the control group's increased, suggesting calibration of overconfidence — related
• ACCESS does not improve self-reported interpersonal functioning relative to delayed treatment among college students with ADHD — related
• Coaching is a promising practice that college students with LD/ADHD report improves their self-awareness, self-management skills, and subjective well-being — related
• MITCA did not improve information-seeking and help management skills relative to traditional homework — related
• MITCA homework prescription improved environmental management relative to traditional homework in primary students — related