Claims

ACCESS does not improve self-reported interpersonal functioning relative to delayed treatment among college students with ADHD

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Although the ACCESS condition improved significantly in interpersonal relationships over time, the rate of change did not differ significantly between conditions (d = .12, non-significant). → Eddy et al. 2021

Evidence

Eddy et al. 2021

Laura D. Eddy, Arthur D. Anastopoulos, Melissa R. Dvorsky, Paul J. Silvia, Jeffrey D. Labban & Joshua M. Langberg (2021). An RCT of a CBT Intervention for Emerging Adults with ADHD Attending College: Functional Outcomes. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2020.1867989

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Latent growth curve analysis of AIM-A Relationships and Communication in the RCT found no significant between-condition difference ("Wald (1) = .71, p = .398"); equivalence was not tested.

"The immediate ACCESS (b = 5.43, SE = 2.57, p = .035) condition significantly improved in interpersonal relationships over time, but the DTC (b = 2.51, SE = 1.83, p = .169) condition did not. Nevertheless, the rate of change did not differ significantly between the groups, Wald (1) = .71, p = .398, d = .12 [-.13, .37]."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.