Claims

T-NOTECHS inter-rater reliability varies widely across ED video-review studies, from moderate (ICC 0.48) to excellent (ICC 0.94)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Reported ICCs for T-NOTECHS in real-life ED resuscitations range from 0.48 (Steinemann) to 0.94 (van Maarseveen), with Bhangu reporting 0.52. → Alexander Emily G 2023

Evidence

Alexander Emily G 2023

Alexander Emily G, Denny Fraser, Gordon Malcom WG, McKiernan Cieran, Lowe David J. (2023). Evaluation of video review tools for assessing non-technical skills in emergency department resuscitation teams: a systematic review. BMC Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-023-00895-7

q2 · i? · review · r3

Narrative synthesis of reliability data across included T-NOTECHS studies; Steinemann reported "an ICC score of 0.48" and van Maarseveen 0.94 (0.87–0.98), which the review characterises as poor versus excellent reliability. Bhangu reported ICC 0.52 without commenting on reliability.

"The T-NOTECHS papers which used ICC were Steinemann et al [23] who had an ICC score of 0.48 for real-life resuscitations and van Maarseveen [20] et al. had an ICC of 0.94 (0.87–0.98)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.